Archi
Contributed by Michael Daniel and Bulbul Musaeva.
The data were gathered in 2018. The Russian version of the questionnaire was used for elicitation.
How to cite
Daniel, Michael & Bulbul Musaeva. 2023. Bivalent patterns in Archi.
In: Say, Sergey (ed.). BivalTyp: Typological database of bivalent verbs and their encoding frames.
(Data first published on April 4, 2026; last revised on September 14, 2026.)
(Available online at https://bivaltyp.info , Accessed on )
Basic info
Coordinates: 42.06, 46.87 .
Genealogy (as given in WALS ). Family: Nakh-Daghestanian, genus: Lezgic.
Macro-area: West Asia and the Caucasus.
Archi, a Lezgic outlier in close contact with two other Nakh-Daghestanian languages, Avar (Avar-Andic) and Lak (Lak), is spoken in several villages in Charoda district. Technically, Archib is an agglomeration of one main village and several former homesteads, The official census of 2010 shows a population of 1,608 people, but since then there has been a sharp decline. Reportedly, not more than 100 families remain in the village on a permanent basis (as of 2026). Several thousands of ethnic Archis live outside the village, but there is no way to assess their language proficiency. The Archis’ neighbours are Laks and Avas, and Archis have traditionally shown a high degree of multilingualism in both languages.
Grammar notes
Basic clause structure and the transitive construction
In terms of both case marking and gender agreement in the clause, Archi shows ergative patterning; the canonical transitive construction is observed in, e.g. (4). The ergative construction is often obscured by the binominative construction involving the converb of the lexical verb and the auxiliary, as in (15, 34, 43, 91), where the converb agrees with the P-argument (like in the canonical transitive construction in (4)); the agreement on the auxiliary is controlled by the A-argument (unlike in the canonical transitive construction in (4)); and both arguments are in the nominative. Causativization is periphrastic by means of ‘do’ (e.g. 72), which is also commonly used in complex predicates (e.g. 70). There are several labile verbs, e.g. ‘break’ in (44).
Case system
Archi has the signature Nakh-Daghestanian nominal inflection design. It includes two largely independent paradigms - cases (alias syntactic cases, grammatical cases) and spatial forms (alias spatial cases, locative cases). Archi has ten (grammatical) cases: Nominative (unmarked), Ergative, Genitive, Dative, Comitative, Comparative, Causal 'because of X', Substitutive 'instead of X, on X's behalf', and Equative ‘like X’. Spatial forms are morphologically complex, involving one marker for spatial relation (traditionally called "localization") and one marker for directionality (traditionally called "orientation").
There are six markers for spatial relations: i) location on the horizontal surface of a landmark (‘on the table’, SUP), ii) inside a hollow landmark (‘in the box’, IN), iii) between multiple landmarks ('between trees') or inside a mass ('in the water', INTER), iv) at a human landmark (as in ‘at my parents’ place’, HUMLOC), v) location on a vertical surface with a fixation on it (‘on the wall’, CONT), vi) location under a landmark (‘under the table’, SUB).
Only CONT, SUPER, IN and INTER are present in the dataset, with IN and INTER only present in purely spatial contexts (12, 14, 21, 104).
There are six values of directionality: essive (Place; unmarked), lative (Goal, LAT), elative (Source, EL), translative (Path), directive (Direction) and terminative (Limit). Only elative, lative and essive are attested in the dataset. Archi also has a large number of non-bound functional elements that show mixed properties of adverb and adpositions; of all these items, only two show up in the dataset as means of flagging (i.e. postnominally).
There are 16 different flags attested in the data.
Verb lemmas
Citation forms provided in the dataset are infinitives. Archi has a large number of stative predicates, including most property words. Stative predicates lack infinitives; in such cases, the citation form provided equals the root. For the purposes of citation, complex predicates are used as citation form as such.
The root of a stative predicate also happens to be the simplest finite form (present durative); cf. (6, 7); though they may also form imperfective converbs and combine with the auxiliary (5).The auxiliary neutrally follows the converb, and Gender 4 / NPL forms of the auxiliary i coalesces with the converb (e.g. 5, 9).
Glossing abbreviations
1, 2, 3, 4 — nominal genders; ADVZ — adverbializer; ATTR — attributive; COM — comitative; COMP — comparative; CONT — spatial domain on a vertical surface with a fixation on it (‘on the wall'); CVB — converb; DAT — dative; DIR — directive; EL — elative; ERG — ergative; EVID — evidential; GEN — genitive; IN — spatial domain inside a hollow landmark ('in the box'); INF — infinitive; INTER — spatial domain between multiple landmarks ('between trees') or inside a mass ('in the water'); IPFV — imperfective; ITER — iterative; LAT — lative; LOC — locative; M — masculine; NEG — negation; NMLZ — nominalization; NOM — nominative; NPL — non-human plural gender; OBL — oblique; PFV — perfective; PL — plural; PN — person name; PTCL — intensifying particle; R — reflexive; SG — singular; SUP — horizontal surface of the landmark as a spatial domain ('on the table').
Data
Subset examples by valency pattern
Any
NA
DAT_NOM
ERG_COM
ERG_CONT.DIR
ERG_DAT
ERG_GEN
ERG_SUP.LAT
GEN_COM
GEN_NOM
NOM_COM
NOM_COMP
NOM_DAT
NOM_DATxir
NOM_ERG(NON.CORE)
NOM_GENlwana
NOM_IN.EL
NOM_IN.LAT
NOM_INTER
NOM_SUP
NOM_SUP.EL
NOM_SUP.LAT
SUP.EL_GEN
SUP.LAT_NOM
TR
Subset examples by locus
Any
*
TR
X
XY
Y
Valency pattern:
GEN_NOM
X: GEN
Y: NOM
Locus: X
patʼimal-li-n
oˁnt
acːʼar-ši
pn
-
obl
-
gen
head
4.ache-
advz
(4.be)
‘Patimat has a headache.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative). Arguably, the NP in the genitive is a clause-level constituent.
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
patʼimal-li-s
grip
qˁa-li
pn
-
obl
-
dat
influenza
4.come.
pfv
-
cvb
(
evid
)
‘Patimat has the flu.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_COMP
X: NOM
Y: COMP
Locus: Y
patʼimat
gʷači-li-χur
ʟʼinčʼar
pn
dog-
obl
-
comp
be.afraid
‘Patimat is afraid of the dog.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
čʼele
kammu
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
stone
throw.
pfv
‘Pasha threw a stone.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
patʼimal-li-s
arsi
aχˁ-ši
pn
-
obl
-
dat
money
4.be.enough-
advz
(4.be)
‘Patimat has enough money.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.LAT
X: NOM
Y: SUP.LAT
Locus: Y
paša
ɬːʷaːna
moħommad-li-tːi-k
pn
be.similar
pn
-
obl
-
sup
-
lat
‘Pasha resembles Muhammad.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP
X: NOM
Y: SUP
Locus: Y
patʼimat
wiχ
moħommad-li-t
pn
be.trusting
pn
-
obl
-
sup
‘Patimat believes Muhammad.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
patʼimat-li
qʼonqʼ
χːa
pn
-
obl
(
erg
)
book
4.take.
pfv
‘Patimat took a book.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
patʼimat-li-s
noʟʼ
akːu-r-ši
pn
-
obl
-
dat
house
4.see-
ipfv
-
advz
(4.be)
‘Patimat sees a house.’
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
*
*
*
Note: No satisfactory translation has been obtained.
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
patʼimat-li-s
moħommad
χu
pn
-
obl
-
dat
pn
1.find.
pfv
‘Patimat encountered Muhammad.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_IN.LAT
X: NOM
Y: IN.LAT
Locus: Y
moħommad
noʟʼ-a-k
čʼutːe
pn
house-
in
-
lat
1.enter.
pfv
‘Muhammad entered the house.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_COMP
X: NOM
Y: COMP
Locus: Y
paša
χʷa
moħommad-li-χur
pn
1.win.
pfv
pn
-
obl
-
comp
‘Pasha beat Muhammad.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_IN.EL
X: NOM
Y: IN.EL
Locus: Y
paša
tukan-na-š
čʼelle-ši
uʟni
pn
shop-
in
-
el
outside-
dir
1.go.out.
pfv
‘Pasha went out of the shop.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša
χˁon
b-a<r>kʼu-r-ši
w-i
pn
cow
3-<
ipfv
>drive-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
‘Pasha is driving the cow.’
Note: Binominative construction resolves into transitive.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
χol
boqʼˁo
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
branch
bend.
pfv
‘Pasha bent the branch.’
Valency pattern:
ERG_CONT.DIR
X: ERG
Y: CONT.DIR
Locus: Y
paša-mu
moħommad-li-r-ši
bo
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
pn
-
obl
-
cont
-
dir
say.
pfv
‘Pasha told Muhammad.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
patʼimat-li
qʼonqʼ
so-li
pn
-
obl
(
erg
)
book
4.take.
pfv
-
cvb
(
evid
)
‘Pasha is holding a book.’
Note: Resultative construction.
Valency pattern:
NOM_DAT
X: NOM
Y: DAT
Locus: Y
paša
moħommad-li-s
χir
i-w-di
pn
pn
-
obl
-
dat
behind
become-1-
pfv
‘Pasha caught up with Muhammad.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (adverbial element + 'become'). The NP in the dative case can be omitted.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
patʼimat-li
χˁon
b-acu
pn
-
obl
(
erg
)
cow
3-milk.
pfv
‘Patimat milked the cow.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_IN.LAT
X: NOM
Y: IN.LAT
Locus: Y
patʼimat
sːobtːa-k
e-r-di
pn
edge.
in
-
lat
reach-2-
pfv
‘Patimat reached the bank.’
Valency pattern:
ERG_DAT
X: ERG
Y: DAT
Locus: Y
patʼimat-li
čʼeˁn-ni-s
qˁečbo
pn
-
obl
(
erg
)
wall-
obl
-
dat
touch.
pfv
‘Patimat touched the wall.’
Valency pattern:
ERG_COM
X: ERG
Y: COM
Locus: Y
paša-mu
anχː
a-r-ši
i
moħommad-li-ɬːu
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
fight
4.do-
ipfv
-
advz
4.be
pn
-
obl
-
com
‘Pasha is fighting with Muhammad.’
Valency pattern:
GEN_COM
X: GEN
Y: COM
Locus: XY
paša-n
halmaχ-kul
i
moħommad-li-ɬːu
pn
-
gen
friend-
nmlz
4.cop
pn
-
obl
-
com
‘Pasha is friends with Muhammad.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate. The NP in the genitive displays some properties of a clause-level argument.
Valency pattern:
NOM_DATxir
X: NOM
Y: DATxir
Locus: Y
paša
w-arhar-ši
w-i
moħommad-li-s
χir
pn
1-think-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
pn
-
obl
-
dat
after
‘Pasha is thinking about Muhammad.’
Note: The NP in the dative case cannot be separated from the “χir” element. The combination of the dative case and “χir” is analyzed as an argument-encoding device.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
aˁnš
kunne
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
apple
4.eat.
pfv
‘Pasha ate an apple.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
χˁabχˁi
čʼarqʼas
a<b>u
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
fish
fry
<3>do.
pfv
‘Pasha fried the fish.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.LAT
X: NOM
Y: SUP.LAT
Locus: Y
paša
su<w>kːa-r-ši
w-i
moħommad-li-tːi-k
pn
<1>look-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
pn
-
obl
-
sup
-
lat
‘Pasha is waiting for Muhammad.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
osːu-b
deqʼˁ
e<b>χni-li
pn
-
dat
other-3
way
<3>forget.
pfv
-
cvb
(
evid
)
‘Pasha forgot about the other road.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_GENlwana
X: NOM
Y: GENlwana
Locus: Y
pahmu
ʕummul-li-n
ɬːʷaːna
b-ikir
memory
life-
obl
-
gen
according
3-be.
iter
‘Memory depends on age.’
Note: ɬːʷaːna functions as a postposition (not separable from the NP).
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
moħommad
zappo
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
pn
call.
pfv
‘Pasha called Muhammad.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
moħommad
sin
i<w>tːi
šʷaˁš
pn
-
dat
pn
know
<1>become.
pfv
last.year
‘Pasha got to know Muhammad a year ago.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
moħommad
sini
pn
-
dat
pn
know
‘Pasha knows Muhammad.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša
mandalin
da<b>χi-r-ši
w-i
pn
mandolin
<3>hit-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
‘Pasha is playing the mandolin.’
Note: Binominative construction resolves into transitive.
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
paša
moħommad-li-s
w-akːu-s
w-e<r>qʼə-r-ši
w-i-tʼu
pn
pn
-
obl
-
dat
1-see-
inf
1-<
ipfv
>reach-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be-
neg
‘Pasha avoids Muhammad’ (lit. ‘Pasha tries not to be seen by Muhammad’).
Note: Not included in the database because Y is expressed as an NP within a dependent clause.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
bomba
a<b>u
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
bomba
<3>do.
pfv
‘Pasha made a bomb.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
moħommad
iqʼiˁl
w-a-r-ši
w-i
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
pn
mock
1-do-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
‘Pasha is making fun of Muhammad.’
Valency pattern:
GEN_NOM
X: GEN
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-n
mašin
i
pn
-
gen
car
4.be
‘Pasha has a car.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate. Arguably, the NP in the genitive is a clause-level constituent.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša
nakʼəm-mul
irkːu-r-ši
w-i
pn
key-
pl
npl
-seek-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
‘Pasha is looking for his keys.’
Note: Binominative construction resolves into transitive.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
čʼer
be-ɬde
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
wall
3-paint.
pfv
‘Pasha painted the fence.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša
gʷači-li
w-eqːʼu
pn
dog-
obl
(
erg
)
1-bite.
pfv
‘A dog bit Pasha.’
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
paša
noʟʼ
i-tʼuw
i<w>χːu
pn
house
4.be-
cvb
.
neg
<1>remain.
pfv
‘Pasha lost his house.’
Note: Not included in the database because Y is expressed as an NP within a dependent clause.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša
gatu
ba-sa-r-ši
w-i
pn
cat
3-catch-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
‘Pasha is trying to catch the cat.’
Note: Binominative construction resolves into transitive.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
kʼuħan
aqˁu
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
stick
4.break.
pfv
‘Pasha broke a stick.’
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
*
*
*
Note: No satisfactory translation has been obtained.
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
moħommad-li-s
patʼimat
ʟʼan-ši
d-i
pn
-
obl
-
dat
pn
love-
advz
2-be
‘Muhammad loves Patimat.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
patʼimat-li
gatʼ
lapʼa-r-ši
b-i
pn
-
obl
(
erg
)
shawl
wave-
ipfv
-
advz
3-be
‘Pasha is waving a shawl.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
patʼimat-li-s
noˁš
ʟʼan-ši
b-i
pn
-
obl
-
dat
horse
want-
advz
3-be
‘Pasha is dreaming of a horse.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
gruška
čučəbo
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
cup[
r
]
wash.
pfv
‘Pasha washed the cup.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
paˁtːəl
b-uwʟu
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
trousers
3-put.on.
pfv
‘Pasha put on his trousers.’
Valency pattern:
SUP.LAT_NOM
X: SUP.LAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
jamu-t-mi-tːi-k
kompas
war
this-4-
obl
-
sup
-
lat
compass
say.
ipfv
‘This is called a compass.’
Note: a) This is a transimpersonal construction. b) It is not clear whether the NP in the nominative case shares syntactic properties with other nominative NPs.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
zari
un
nakazat
u-w-li
i
.
erg
you.
sg
(
nom
)
punish[
r
]
do.
pfv
-1-
cvb
(
evid
)
‘I punished you.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.LAT
X: NOM
Y: SUP.LAT
Locus: Y
χːams
χˁabχˁ-du
sa-r-tːu-m-mu-tːi-k
tʼankʼ
bo
bear
fish-
pl
npl
.catch-
ipfv
-
attr
-1-
obl
.
m
-
sup
-
lat
jump
say.
pfv
‘A bear attacked a fisherman.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_ERG(NON.CORE)
X: NOM
Y: ERG(NON.CORE)
Locus: Y
budra
ɬːenne
a<b>cʼu-li
bucket
water.
o
bl(
erg
)
<3>fill.
pfv
-
cvb
(
evid
)
‘The bucket filled with water.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
nakʼəm-mul
χo
pn
-
dat
key-
pl
npl
.find.
pfv
‘Pasha found his keys.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
os
dollar
b-aχˁ
be-ke-r-ši
b-i-tʼu
pn
-
dat
one
dollar
3-be.sufficient
3-become-
ipfv
-
advz
3-be-
neg
‘Pasha is one dollar short.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
marin
mu-tʼu-ši
d-akːu-r-ši
d-i
pn
-
dat
pn
be.good-
neg
-
advz
2-see-
ipfv
-
advz
2-be
‘Pasha hates Marina.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
ja-b
χˁošon
mu-ši
b-akːu-r
pn
-
dat
this-3
shirt
be.good-
advz
3-see-
ipfv
‘Pasha likes this shirt.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
arsi
kʷatʼ-ši
i
pn
-
dat
money
need-
advz
4.be
‘Pasha needs money.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
šahru
čʼel-li
kʷe<b>k-də-li
town
wall-
obl
(
erg
)
<3>spin-
pfv
-
cvb
(
evid
)
‘Walls surround the city.’
Valency pattern:
GEN_NOM
X: GEN
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-n
wijcʼ-a<b>u
dollar
e<b>χːu-li
pn
-
gen
ten-<3>
ptcl
dollar
<3>remain.
pfv
-
cvb
(
evid
)
‘Pasha has ten dollars left.’
Note: Arguably, the NP in the genitive is a clause-level constituent.
Valency pattern:
ERG_DAT
X: ERG
Y: DAT
Locus: Y
paša-mu
učitel-li-s
žawab
ʟo
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
teacher-
obl
-
dat
answer
4.give.
pfv
‘Pasha answered the teacher.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
bankːa
dabɬu
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
jar
open.
pfv
‘Pasha opened a jar.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_COMP
X: NOM
Y: COMP
Locus: Y
b-is
χˁošon
utːo-m-mi-χur
χːˁoro-ši
b-i
3-
i
.
gen
shirt
your-3-
obl
-
comp
be.different-
advz
3-be
‘My shirt is different from yours.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
NOM_COMP
X: NOM
Y: COMP
Locus: Y
paša
marin-ni-χur
χir
i<w>χːu
pn
pn
-
obl
-
comp
behind
<1>remain.
pfv
‘Pasha fell behind Marina.’
Note: χir is part of the predicate (an adverbial element). The NP in the comparative case can be omitted.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša
uχ
hija-r-ši
w-i
pn
field
plow-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
‘Pasha is ploughing the field.’
Note: Binominative construction resolves into transitive.
Valency pattern:
SUP.EL_GEN
X: SUP.EL
Y: GEN
Locus: XY
is
kurʁul-če-tːi-š
bənzin-ni-n
di
carχa-r-ši
npl
.
i
.
gen
hand.
pl
-
obl
.
pl
-
sup
-
el
gas-
obl
-
gen
smell
4.<
ipfv
>throw-
ipfv
-
advz
(4.be)
‘My hands smell of gasoline.’
Note: The NP in the genitive displays some properties of a clause-level argument.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
deqʼˁ
a<b>tʼu
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
way
<3>cut.
pfv
‘Pasha crossed the road.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
mu-tːu-t
lagum
χabu
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
be.good-
attr
-4
song
sing.
pfv
‘Pasha sang a beautiful song.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
kaʁər
ši
a<b>u
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
paper
write
<3>do.
pfv
‘Pasha wrote a letter.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
naˁʟʼ
cʼabu
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
milk
drink.
pfv
‘Pasha drank the milk.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
tʼeˁčʼu
cʼa-sː
aw
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
lead
4.thaw-
inf
4.do.
pfv
‘Pasha melted a piece of lead.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_DAT
X: NOM
Y: DAT
Locus: Y
ja-t
qʼˁotʼol
b-is
χːˁašna-s
tʼalek
i
this-4
belt
3-
i
.
gen
dress.
obl
-
dat
correctly
4.be
‘This belt goes well with my dress.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
žu-n-u<b>u
šahru
b-ocər
a<b>tːi
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
self-
gen
-<3>
ptcl
town
3-leave
<3>let.
pfv
‘Pasha left his native city.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
diwin-ni
obšːi
qʼatːu
noʟʼ
ca<r>qˁa-r-ši
carpet-
obl
(
erg
)
all
down
room
<
ipfv
>hide-
ipfv
-
advz
(4.be)
‘The carpet covers the whole floor.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
mu-ši
ikʼm=i
žu-n-tʼu
noʟʼ
pn
-
dat
be.good-
advz
heart.
loc
=4.be
self.
m
-
gen
-4.
ptcl
house
‘Pasha remembers his house well.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
ERG_DAT
X: ERG
Y: DAT
Locus: Y
paša-mu
marin-ni-s
kumak
a<b>u
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
pn
-
obl
-
dat
help
<3>do.
pfv
‘Pasha helped Marina.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
francija-li-n
čʼat
sini
pn
-
dat
f
rance-
obl
-
gen
language
know
‘Pasha understands the French language.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NOM_DAT
X: NOM
Y: DAT
Locus: Y
parəl
noʟʼ-li-s
caχu
lightning
house-
obl
-
dat
4.hit.
pfv
‘Lightning struck the house.’
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
paša-n
močʼor
χːartʼa-r-tːu-t-mi-tː-iš
bi
ba-qˁa-li
pn
-
gen
beard
shave-
ipfv
-
attr
-4-
obl
-
sup
-
el
blood
3-come.
pfv
-
cvb
(
evid
)
‘There is blood coming off Pasha’s razor.’
Note: Not included in the database because the translation deviates too far from the stimulus sentence.
Valency pattern:
NOM_DAT
X: NOM
Y: DAT
Locus: Y
istəkan
ustul-li-s
eχ-di-li
glass
table-
obl
-
dat
4.climb-
pfv
-
cvb
(
evid
)
‘The glass got stuck to the table.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_COMP
X: NOM
Y: COMP
Locus: Y
paša
marin-ni-χur
uqːʼˁa
pn
pn
-
obl
-
comp
1.lose.
pfv
‘Pasha lost to Marina.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.EL
X: NOM
Y: SUP.EL
Locus: Y
paša
kaʁal-li-tːi-š
χːʷar
i<w>tːi
pn
paper-
obl
-
sup
-
el
be.glad
1.become.
pfv
‘Pasha was glad about the letter.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NOM_COM
X: NOM
Y: COM
Locus: Y
paša
marin-ni-ɬːu
baˁːbuˁ-r-ši
w-i
pn
pn
-
obl
-
com
talk-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
‘Pasha is speaking with Marina.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
marin-ni-s
wišdu
uw
pn
-
obl
-
dat
son
1.do.
pfv
‘Marina gave birth to a son.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
istəkan
ek-as
aw
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
glass
4.fall-
inf
4.do.
pfv
‘Pasha dropped the glass.’
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
paša
olo
duχːul-li-n
doːˁzu
pn
4.we.
gen
village-
obl
-
gen
be.big.
attr
‘Pasha runs our village.’
Note: Not included in the database because X is expressed as an NP-internal modifier.
Valency pattern:
NOM_DATxir
X: NOM
Y: DATxir
Locus: Y
paša
marin-ni-s
χir
bazar-ši
w-i
pn
pn
-
obl
-
dat
behind
be.missing-
advz
1-be
‘Pasha misses Marina.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative). The NP in the dative case cannot be separated from the “χir” element. The combination of the dative case and “χir” is analyzed as an argument-encoding device.
Valency pattern:
NOM_DAT
X: NOM
Y: DAT
Locus: Y
paša
marin-ni-s
χir
su<w>kːa-r-ši
w-i
pn
pn
-
obl
-
dat
behind
<1>look-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
‘Pasha follows Marina.’
Note: χir is part of the predicate (an adverbial element). The NP in the dative case can be separated from the “χir” element.
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.EL
X: NOM
Y: SUP.EL
Locus: Y
paša
noˁši-tːi-š
u<w>χːˁu
pn
horse.
obl
-
sup
-
el
<1>go.down.
pfv
‘Pasha got down from the horse.’
Valency pattern:
ERG_SUP.LAT
X: ERG
Y: SUP.LAT
Locus: Y
paša
radio-li-tːi-k
oj
aču-li
w-i
pn
radio-
obl
-
sup
-
lat
ear
4.throw.
pfv
-
cvb
1-be
‘Pasha is listening to the radio.’
Note: Binominative construction resolves into transitive.
Valency pattern:
ERG_SUP.LAT
X: ERG
Y: SUP.LAT
Locus: Y
paša-mu
buwa-tːi-k
oj
a<r>č-ar
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
mother-
sup
-
lat
ear
4.<
ipfv
>throw-
ipfv
‘Pasha listens to his mother.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
lagum-mul
ko-r-ši
pn
-
dat
song-
pl
npl
.hear-
ipfv
-
advz
(
npl
.be)
‘Pasha hears the music.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_COM
X: NOM
Y: COM
Locus: Y
imcʼ
neˁʟʼə-ɬːu
ɬːoχˁu-li
honey
milk.
obl
-
com
4.mix.
pfv
-
cvb
(
evid
)
‘The honey got mixed with milk.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.LAT
X: NOM
Y: SUP.LAT
Locus: Y
paša
doɬːor-če-tːi-k
su<w>kːa-r-ši
w-i
pn
cloud.
pl
-
obl
.
pl
-
sup
-
lat
<1>look-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
‘Pasha is looking at the clouds.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
χːˁošon
b-aχːa
a<b>u
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
shirt
3-away
<3>do.
pfv
‘Pasha took off his shirt.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
marin
mikʼir
d-akːu-r-ši
d-i
pn
-
dat
pn
in.the.dream
2-see-
ipfv
-
advz
2-be
‘Pasha dreams about Marina.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_COM
X: NOM
Y: COM
Locus: Y
paša
marina-ɬːu
raˁzi
i<w>tːi
pn
pn
-
com
agree
<1>become.
pfv
‘Pasha agreed with Marina.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
GEN_COM
X: GEN
Y: COM
Locus: XY
paša-n
duʕilas
etːi
marin-ni-ɬːu
pn
-
gen
conflict
4.become.
pfv
pn
-
obl
-
com
‘Pasha had a quarrel with Marina.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP
X: NOM
Y: SUP
Locus: Y
ja-t
gruška
os
dollal-li-t
i
this-4
mug
one
dollar-
obl
-
sup
4.be
‘This cup costs 1 dollar.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
ERG_DAT
X: ERG
Y: DAT
Locus: Y
paša-mu
nacʼa-s
kammu,
ammo
bo-sːo-tʼu
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
bird.
obl
-
dat
throw.
pfv
but
3-catch.
pfv
-
neg
‘Pasha shot at the bird but he missed’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
pisokʼ
a<b>ču
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
sugar[
r
]
<3>throw.
pfv
‘Pasha poured the sugar into the cup.’
Valency pattern:
GEN_NOM
X: GEN
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-n
nakʼən
i-tʼ-etːi
pn
-
gen
key
4.be-
neg
-4.become.
pfv
‘Pasha lost his keys.’
Note: The NP in the genitive displays some properties of a clause-level argument.
Valency pattern:
NOM_INTER
X: NOM
Y: INTER
Locus: Y
šaˁtːi-li-n
qʼˁartʼi
ɬːenne-qˁ
oqːʼˁu-li
oqˁa
beam-
obl
-
gen
roller
water.
obl
-
inter
4.go.down.
pfv
-
cvb
4.go.
pfv
‘The log sank in the water.’
Note: It is not entirely clear whether the first NP conventionally denotes a wooden log.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
muħammad
u<w>ču
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
pn
<1>kill.
pfv
‘Pasha killed Muhammad.’
Valency pattern:
ERG_DAT
X: ERG
Y: DAT
Locus: Y
paša-mu
muħammad-li-s
daχ-di
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
pn
-
obl
-
dat
4.hit-
pfv
‘Pasha hit Muhammad.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
marin
hijtbo
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
pn
kiss.
pfv
‘Pasha kissed Marina.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
mu-tːu-t
qʼonqʼ
oʟəni
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
be.good-
attr
-4
book
4.read.
pfv
‘Pasha read a good book.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ERG
Y: NOM
Locus: TR
paša-mu
gon
χːəriχː
a<b>u
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
finger
move
<3>do.
pfv
‘Pasha moved his finger.’
Valency pattern:
ERG_GEN
X: ERG
Y: GEN
Locus: Y
paša-mu
marin-ni-n
qʼimat
b-a-r
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
pn
-
obl
-
gen
respect
3-do-
ipfv
‘Pasha respects Marina.’
Note: The NP in the genitive displays some properties of a clause-level constituent.
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
paša-s
qʼˁabʁˁ-du-t
gel
kʼočʼo
ʟʼan
ke-r-tʼu
pn
-
dat
be.dirty-
attr
-4
cup
dish
want
4.become-
ipfv
-
neg
‘Pasha does not like dirty dishes.’
Note: Not included in the database because the translation deviates too far from the stimulus sentence. Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.EL
X: NOM
Y: SUP.EL
Locus: Y
paša
raˁzi-ši
w-i
žu-n-uwwu
laha-tːi-š
pn
agree-
advz
1-be
self.
m
-
gen
-1.
ptcl
child-
sup
-
el
‘Pasha is satisfied with his son.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
marin
ʟʼan
e<r>tːi-li
pn
-
dat
pn
want
<2>become.
pfv
-
cvb
(
evid
)
‘Pasha fell in love with Marina.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP
X: NOM
Y: SUP
Locus: Y
paša
marin-ni-t
wiχ
pn
pn
-
obl
-
sup
be.trusting
‘Pasha trusts Marina.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
žu-n-aru
ijtːur
tʼibir
pn
-
dat
self.
m
-
gen
-<2>
ptcl
mother
feel.pity
‘Pasha sympathises with his mother.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP
X: NOM
Y: SUP
Locus: Y
paša
marina-t
maˁrš
pn
pn
-
sup
be.envious
‘Pasha envies Marina.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.LAT
X: NOM
Y: SUP.LAT
Locus: Y
paša
marin-ni-tːi-k
qʼˁara-s
w-e<r>χi-r-ši
w-i
pn
pn
-
obl
-
sup
-
lat
be.angry-
inf
1-<
ipfv
>rise-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
‘Pasha is angry with Marina.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.EL
X: NOM
Y: SUP.EL
Locus: Y
paša
χːi
i<w>tːi
ja-b
sːijʁat-li-tːi-š
pn
be.surprised
<1>become.
pfv
this-3
present-
obl
-
sup
-
el
‘Pasha was surprised at this gift.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
paša-s
čij
ʟʼan
ke-r
pn
-
dat
tea
want
4.become-
ipfv
‘Pasha liked the tea.’
Note: Not included in the database because the translation deviates too far from the stimulus sentence. Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
paša
haˁršːa-r-tːu-t
čij
χːu-r-ši
w-i
pn
boiling-
ipfv
-
attr
-4
tea
drink-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
‘Pasha is drinking hot tea (making pauses between gulps).’
Note: Not included in the database because the translation deviates too far from the stimulus sentence.
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
macːʼa-tːu-t
təlipon
ʟʼan-ši
pn
-
dat
be.new-
attr
-4
phone[
r
]
want-
advz
(4.be)
‘Pasha wants a new mobile phone.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.LAT
X: NOM
Y: SUP.LAT
Locus: Y
paša
qʼˁara-r-ši
w-i
marin-ni-tːi-k
pn
be.angry-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
pn
-
obl
-
sup
-
lat
‘Pasha holds a grudge against Marina.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.EL
X: NOM
Y: SUP.EL
Locus: Y
paša
u<w>χˁu-li
marin-ni-tːi-š
pn
<1>become.mad-
cvb
pn
-
obl
-
sup
-
el
‘Pasha took offence at Marina.’
Valency pattern:
SUP.EL_GEN
X: SUP.EL
Y: GEN
Locus: XY
paša-tːi-š
marin-ni-n
ikʼʷ
aqˁu
pn
-
sup
-
el
pn
-
obl
-
gen
heart
4.break.
pfv
‘Pasha greatly upset Marina.’
Note: The NP in the genitive displays some properties of a clause-level argument.
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.EL
X: NOM
Y: SUP.EL
Locus: Y
paša
χːi
i<w>tːi
ja-b
šahru-li-tːi-š
pn
be.surprised
<1>become.
pfv
that-3
town-
obl
-
sup
-
el
‘Pasha was impressed by this town.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
paša-mu
ʟʼarak
d-a-r-ši
d-i
marin
pn
-
obl
.
m
(
erg
)
below
2-do-
ipfv
-
advz
2-be
pn
‘Pasha humiliates Marina.’
Note: Not included in the database because this translation is semantically inaccurate.
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.EL
X: NOM
Y: SUP.EL
Locus: Y
paša
pašman
i<w>tːi
žu-n-uwwu
laha-tːi-š
pn
be.sad
<1>become.
pfv
self.
m
-
gen
-1.
ptcl
child.
obl
-
sup
-
el
‘Pasha got upset because of his son.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.LAT
X: NOM
Y: SUP.LAT
Locus: Y
paša
qʼˁara-r-ši
w-i
žu-n-u<r>u
laha-tːi-k
pn
be.angry-
ipfv
-
advz
1-be
self.
m
-
gen
-<2>
ptcl
child.
obl
-
sup
-
lat
‘Pasha is getting irritated with his daughter.’
Valency pattern:
DAT_NOM
X: DAT
Y: NOM
Locus: X
paša-s
marin
mu-ši
d-akːu-r-ši
d-i
pn
-
dat
pn
be.good-
advz
2-see-
ipfv
-
advz
2-be
‘Pasha is fond of Marina.’
Valency pattern:
NOM_SUP.EL
X: NOM
Y: SUP.EL
Locus: Y
paša
žu-n-tʼu
tʼi-kul-li-tːi-š
libχˁ
kʷer
pn
self.
m
-
gen
-4.
ptcl
be.small-
nmlz
-
obl
-
sup
-
el
feel.embarrassed
1.become.
ipfv
‘Pasha is embarrassed about his height.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (stative).