Tagalog
Contributed by Rowena Garcia and Rhenee Espayos (ResearchGate profile )
The English version of the questionnaire was used for elicitation. The identification of valency encoding devices and valency classes is primarily based on the system proposed by Sergei Klimenko (2019). His generous assistance with the data analysis is gratefully acknowledged.
Klimenko, Sergei (2019). Criteria for establishing the inventory of semantic participants and voices in Tagalog. Studies in language 43(1). 1-43.
How to cite
Garcia, Rowena & Rhenee Espayos. 2023. Bivalent patterns in Tagalog.
In: Say, Sergey (ed.). BivalTyp:
Typological database of bivalent verbs and their encoding frames.
(Data first published on August 11, 2023; last revised on December 13, 2023.)
(Available online at https://www.bivaltyp.info , Accessed on )
Basic info
Coordinates: 14.06, 121.75 .
Genealogy (as given in WALS ). Family: Austronesian, genus: Greater Central Phillipine.
Macro-area: East and Southeast Asia.
Data
Subset examples by valency pattern
Any
NA
ACT_BARE
ACT_CAUSE
ACT_gamit
ACT_LIN
ACT_LOC
ACT_mulaPATH
ACT_PATH
ACT_SBJNV
LOC_ACT
SBJNV_BARE
SBJNV_CAUSE
SBJNV_LIN
SBJNV_LOC
TR
UND_ACT
UND_LIN
Subset examples by locus
Any
*
TR
X
XY
Y
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
masakit
ang
ulo
ni
Pedro
painful
subj
head
pers
.
gen
pn
‘Pedro’s head hurts.’
Note: Not included in the database because Y is expressed as an NP-internal modifier. Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_BARE
X: SBJNV
Y: BARE
Locus: XY
may
trangkaso
si
Pedro
exist
flu
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro has the flu.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
na-ta~takot
si
Pedro
sa
aso
av
.
ipfv
-
ipfv
~be_afraid
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
dog
‘Pedro is afraid of the dog.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promoted to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
h<in>agis
ni
Pedro
ang
bato
<
pv
>
pfv
.throw
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
stone
‘Pedro threw a stone.’
Note: Co-exists with an AV construction.
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_BARE
X: SBJNV
Y: BARE
Locus: XY
may
sapat
na
pera
na
si
Pedro
exist
enough
lin
money
already
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro now has enough money.’
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
ka-hawig
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
lolo
com
-resemblance
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
grandfather
‘Pedro resembles his grandfather.’
Note: Not included in the database because X is expressed as an NP-internal modifier.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
na-ni~niwala
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
av
.
ipfv
-
ipfv
~believe
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro believes Miguel.’
Note: Co-exists with the causativized construction with LV and Y argument marked as PERS.SUBJ.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
k<um>uha
si
Pedro
ng
libro
<
av
>
pfv
.take
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
book
‘Pedro took a book.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-ki~kita
ni
Pedro
ang
bahay
pot
.
pv
-
ipfv
~see
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
house
‘Pedro sees a house.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
naka-ka~impluwensya
sa
memorya
ang
edad
pot
.
av
-
ipfv
~influence
dat
memory
subj
age
‘Age influences memory.’
Note: This kind of marking co-exists with the [SUBJ; GEN] encoding, hence the verb is classified as ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-ka-salubong
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
pot
-
com
-encounter[
pv
]
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro encountered Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_PATH
X: ACT
Y: PATH
Locus: Y
p<um>asok
si
Pedro
sa
bahay
<
av
>
pfv
.enter
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
house
‘Pedro entered the house.’
Note: The Y argument can also be signaled as "pa-loob ng bahay" [DIR-inside GEN house].
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
t<in>alo
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
pfv
.beat
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro beat Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_PATH
X: ACT
Y: PATH
Locus: Y
l<um>abas
si
Pedro
ng
bahay
<
av
>
pfv
.go_out
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
house
‘Pedro went out of the house.’
Note: The Y argument can also be signaled as "pa-labas ng bahay" [DIR-exit GEN house].
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
d<in>a~dala
ni
Pedro
ang
baka
sa
pastulan
<
pv
>
ipfv
~bring
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
cow
dat
pasture
‘Pedro is bringing the cow to the pasture.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
b<in>aluktot
ni
Pedro
ang
sanga
<
pv
>
pfv
.bend
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
branch
‘Pedro bent the branch.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
s<in>abih-an
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pfv
>say-
lv
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro told Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_LIN
X: SBJNV
Y: LIN
Locus: XY
may
hawak
na
libro
si
Pedro
exist
hold
lin
book
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is holding a book.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
h<um>abol
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
<
av
>
pfv
.catch_up
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro caught up with Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
g<in>atas-an
ni
Pedro
ang
baka
<
pv
>
pfv
.milk-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
cow
‘Pedro milked the cow.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible with different NPs, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
ACT_PATH
X: ACT
Y: PATH
Locus: Y
naka-rating
si
Pedro
sa
bangko
pot
.
av
.
pfv
-reach
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
bank
‘Pedro reached the bank.’
Note: The Y argument can also be signaled by a locative phrase, e.g. "pa-punta bangko" [DIR-go bank].
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
h<in>awak-an
ni
Pedro
ang
pader
<
pfv
>touch-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
wall
‘Pedro touched the wall.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible with different NPs, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
<in>a~away
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
ipfv
~fight
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
pn
‘Pedro is fighting with Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
kaibigan
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
friend
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is friends with Miguel.’
Note: Not included in the database because X is expressed as an NP-internal modifier. Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
<in>i~isip
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
ipfv
>
ipfv
~think[
lv
]
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is thinking about Miguel.’
Note: It seems to be impossible to find examples with the GEN ("ng") encoding of Y in the Actor Voice. Hence, this is classified as LV and ACT_LOC.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
k<um>ain
si
Pedro
ng
mansanas
<
av
>
pfv
.eat
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
apple
‘Pedro ate an apple.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
pr<in>ito
ni
Pedro
ang
isda
<
pv
>
pfv
.fry
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
fish
‘Pedro fried the fish.’
Note: Co-exists with the AV construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
nag-hi~hintay
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
av
-
ipfv
~wait
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro is waiting for Miguel.’
Note: Co-exists with a PV construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-ka-limut-an
ni
Pedro
ang
iba
pa-ng
daan
pot
.
pfv
-
stem
-forget-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
other
clitic-
lin
way
‘Pedro forgot about the other road.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible with different NPs, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_LOC
X: SBJNV
Y: LOC
Locus: XY
naka-depende
ang
memorya
sa
edad
stat
-depend
subj
memory
dat
age
‘Memory depends on age.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (state).
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
t<in>awag
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
pfv
.call
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro called Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-kilala
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
pot
.
pfv
.
pv
-know
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro got to know Miguel.’
Note: Verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
ACT_SBJNV
X: ACT
Y: SBJNV
Locus: Y
kilala
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
knows
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro knows Miguel.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (pseudo-verb). The interpretation of X as ACT is partially arbitrary (it is based on the analogy with constructions with voice markers).
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
t<um>u~tugtog
ng
gitara
si
Pedro
<
av
>
ipfv
~play
gen
guitar
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is playing the guitar.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
<um>i~iwas
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
<
av
>
ipfv
~avoid
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro avoids Miguel.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is not possible. Co-exists with the LV construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
g<um>awa
ng
panghuli
ng
daga
si
Pedro
<
av
>
pfv
.make
gen
trap
gen
rat
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro made a mousetrap.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
p<in>ag-ta~tawan-an
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
ipfv
>
stem
-
ipfv
~laugh-
lv
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is making fun of Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_BARE
X: SBJNV
Y: BARE
Locus: XY
may
kotse
si
Pedro
exist
car
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro has a car.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
h<in>a~hanap
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
susi
<
pv
>
ipfv
~find
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
keys
‘Pedro is looking for his keys.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
p<in>inturah-an
ni
Pedro
ang
bakod
<
pfv
>paint-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
fence
‘Pedro painted the fence.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible with different NPs, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
k<in>agat
ng
aso
si
Pedro
<
pv
>
pfv
~bite
gen
dog
pers
.
subj
pn
‘A dog bit Pedro.’
Valency pattern:
LOC_ACT
X: LOC
Y: ACT
Locus: X
na-wala-n
ng
bahay
si
Pedro
pot
.
pfv
-lose-
lv
gen
house
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro lost his house.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
h<in>u~huli
ni
Pedro
ang
pusa
<
pv
>
ipfv
~catch
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
cat
‘Pedro is trying to catch the cat.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-bali
ni
Pedro
ang
patpat
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-break
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
stick
‘Pedro broke a stick.’
Note: Alternative is a POT.AV construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
b<in>o~bola
ni
Pedro
si
Maria
<
pv
>
ipfv
~flatter
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is flattering Maria.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
m<in>a~mahal
ni
Pedro
si
Maria
<
pv
>
ipfv
~love
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro loves Maria.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
w<in>a~wagayway
ni
Pedro
ang
panyo
<
pv
>
ipfv
~wave
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
handkerchief
‘Pedro is waving the handkerchief.’
Note: Alternative is the AV construction, also with the ACT_UND pattern.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-nga~ngarap
si
Pedro
ng
bago-ng
sasakyan
av
-
ipfv
~dream
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
new-
lin
vehicle
‘Pedro is dreaming of a new car.’
Note: Alternative is the CAUS<PV> construction, also with the ACT_UND pattern.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
h<in>ugas-an
ni
Pedro
ang
baso
<
pfv
>wash-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
cup
‘Pedro washed the cup.’
Note: The GEN encoding of Y is possible in the AV construction, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
i-s<in>uot
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
pantalon
cv
<
pv
>
pfv
.put_on
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
trousers
‘Pedro put on his trousers.’
Note: Alternative is the AV construction, also with the ACT_UND pattern.
Valency pattern:
UND_LIN
X: UND
Y: LIN
Locus: XY
t<in>a~tawag
na
compass
ang
gamit
na
ito
<
pv
>
ipfv
~call
lin
compass
subj
tool
lin
prx
.
subj
‘This tool is called a compass.’
Note: This is a transimpersonal construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
p<in>arusah-an
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
anak
<
pfv
>punish-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
son
‘Pedro punished his son.’
Note: The GEN encoding of Y is possible in the AV construction, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
<in>atake
ng
oso
ang
mangingisda
<
pv
>
pfv
.attack
gen
bear
subj
fisherman
‘A bear attacked a fisherman.’
Valency pattern:
UND_ACT
X: UND
Y: ACT
Locus: X
na-puno
ng
tubig
ang
timba
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-fill
gen
water
subj
bucket
‘The bucket filled with water.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-hanap
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
susi
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-find
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
keys
‘Pedro found his keys.’
Valency pattern:
UND_ACT
X: UND
Y: ACT
Locus: X
k<in>ulang
ng
piso
si
Pedro
<
pv
>
pfv
.fall_short
gen
peso
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is one peso short.’
Note: The valency label is partially arbitrary, since this verb does not fit the usual scheme: the encoding of arguments is not affected by the contrast between voice markers on the verb.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
na-ga~galit
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
stat
.
pv
-
ipfv
~angry
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro hates Miguel.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promoted to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_SBJNV
X: ACT
Y: SBJNV
Locus: Y
gusto
ni
Pedro
ito-ng
damit
like
pers
.
gen
pn
3.
sg
.
subj
-
lin
shirt
‘Pedro likes this shirt.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate. The interpretation of X as ACT is partially arbitrary (it is based on the analogy with constructions with voice markers).
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-nga~ngailang-an
si
Pedro
ng
pera
ipfv
.
av
-
ipf
~need-
av
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
money
‘Pedro needs money.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
na-pali~libut-an
ng
pader
ang
lungsod
ipfv
.
mod
-
man
-
ipfv
~surround-
lv
gen
wall
subj
city
‘Walls surround the city.’
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_BARE
X: SBJNV
Y: BARE
Locus: XY
may
sampung-piso
na
lang
si
Pedro
exist
ten-peso
now
only
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro only has 10 pesos left.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
s<in>agot
ni
Pedro
ang
guro
<
pfv
>answer[
lv
]
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
teacher
‘Pedro answered the teacher.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
nag-bukas
si
Pedro
ng
lata
av
.
pfv
-open
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
can
‘Pedro opened a can.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
na-i~iba
ang
damit
ko
sa
iyo
<
ipfv
>
stem
-
ipfv
~be_different[
av
]
subj
shirt
1.
sg
.
gen
dat
yours
‘My shirt is different from yours.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
na-huli
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
<
pfv
>
stem
-be_last[
av
]
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro fell behind Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
<in>a~araro
ni
Pedro
ang
bukid
<
pv
>
ipfv
~plough
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
field
‘Pedro is ploughing the field.’
Note: Co-exists with the AV-construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_BARE
X: ACT
Y: BARE
Locus: Y
na-nga~ngamoy
gasolina
ang
kamay
ko
av
.
stem
.
ipfv
~
ipfv
-smell
gasoline
subj
hands
1.
sg
.
gen
‘My hands smell of gasoline.’
Note: The label BARE is used because there is no overt flagging associated with this argument.
Valency pattern:
ACT_PATH
X: ACT
Y: PATH
Locus: Y
t<um>awid
si
Pedro
sa
kalsada
<
av
>
pfv
.cross
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
road
‘Pedro crossed the road.’
Note: The Y-argument can be also introduced by PATH-expressions, such as "pa-tawid ng ilog" [DIR-cross GEN river].
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
k<um>anta
si
Pedro
ng
maganda-ng
kanta
<
av
>
pfv
.sing
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
beautiful-
lin
song
‘Pedro sang a beautiful song.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
s<um>ulat
si
Pedro
ng
liham
<
av
>
pfv
.write
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
letter
‘Pedro wrote a letter.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
<um>inom
si
Pedro
ng
gatas
<
av
>
pfv
.drink
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
milk
‘Pedro drank the milk.’
Note: Co-exists with the PV-construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
t<in>unaw
ni
Pedro
ang
piraso
ng
tingga
<
pv
>
pfv
.melt
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
piece
gen
lead
‘Pedro melted a piece of lead.’
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_LOC
X: SBJNV
Y: LOC
Locus: XY
bagay
ang
sinturon
sa
damit
ko
appropriate
subj
belt
dat
dress
1.
sg
.
gen
‘This belt goes well with my dress.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (adjective).
Valency pattern:
ACT_PATH
X: ACT
Y: PATH
Locus: Y
ni-lisan
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
pinanggalingan
pfv
-leave[
p
ath
v
]
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
native_city
‘Pedro left his native city.’
Note: The Y-argument can be also introduced by PATH-expressions in AV constructions, such as "l<um>isan pa-alis Maynila" [<AV>PFV.leave DIR-leave Manila].
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
na-ta~takp-an
ng
karpet
ang
buo-ng
sahig
pot
.
ipfv
-
ipfv
~cover-
lv
gen
carpet
subj
whole-
lin
floor
‘The carpet covers the whole floor.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-a~alala
pa
ni
Pedro
ang
bahay
na
kinalakihan
niya
pot
.
pv
-
ipfv
~remember
still
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
house
lin
place_where_one_grew_up
3.
sg
.
gen
‘Pedro still remembers the house where he grew up.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
t<in>u~lung-an
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pfv
>
pfv
~help-
lv
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro helped Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
naka-ka~intindi
si
Pedro
ng
French
pot
.
av
-
ipfv
~understand
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
f
rench
‘Pedro understands French.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
t<in>ama-an
ng
kidlat
ang
bahay
<
pfv
>hit-
lv
gen
lightning
subj
house
‘Lightning hit the house.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_gamit
X: ACT
Y: gamit
Locus: Y
na-hiwa
ni
Pedro
ang
sarili
gamit
ang
pang-ahit
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-cut
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
self
using
subj
razor
‘Pedro cut himself with a razor.’
Note: gamit is a originally a verb that has partially grammaticalized into a preposition.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
na-dikit
ang
baso
sa
mesa
<
pfv
>
stem
-stick[
av
]
subj
glass
dat
table
‘The glass got stuck to the table.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
na-talo
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
<
pfv
>
stem
-lose[
av
]
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro lost to Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
na-galak
si
Pedro
sa
sulat
<
pfv
>
stem
-be_glad[
av
]
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
letter
‘Pedro was glad about the letter.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promoted to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
na-ki~ki-pag-usap
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
av
-
soc
~
ipfv
-
nom
-communicate
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro is speaking with Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-nganak
ng
anak
na
lalaki
si
Maria
av
.
pfv
-give_birth
gen
child
lin
male
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Maria gave birth to a son.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-hulog
ni
Pedro
ang
salamin
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-drop
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
glass
‘Pedro dropped the glass.’
Note: Co-exists with the regular PV construction that implies intentional action and has the same encoding frame.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
p<in>a-mu~munu-an
ni
Pedro
ang
amin-g
bayan
<
ipfv
>
stem
-
ipfv
~head-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
1.
pl
.
ex
.
dat
-
lin
town
‘Pedro runs our town.’
Note: The GEN encoding of Y is possible in the AV construction, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
na-ngu~ngulila
si
Pedro
kay
Maria
<
ipfv
>
stem
-
ipfv
~feel_lonely[
av
]
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro misses Maria.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
s<um>u~sunod
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
<
av
>
ipfv
~follow
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro follows Miguel.’
Note: It is possible that the Y argument is actually a PATH, but it is not easy to identify uses with an explicit path-like encoding, hence it is classified as LOC.
Valency pattern:
ACT_mulaPATH
X: ACT
Y: mulaPATH
Locus: Y
b<um>aba
si
Pedro
mula
sa
kabayo
<
av
>
pfv
.go_down
pers
.
subj
pn
from
dat
horse
‘Pedro got down from the horse.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-ki~kinig
si
Pedro
sa
radyo
<
av
>
ipfv
~listen
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
radio
‘Pedro is listening to radio.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible with the same Y-argument, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
s<um>u~sunod
palagi
si
Pedro
sa
nanay
niya
<
av
>
ipfv
~obey
always
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
mother
3.
sg
.
gen
‘Pedro always listens to / obeys his mother.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible, hence ACT_UND. Co-exists with the PV-construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-ri~rinig
ni
Pedro
ang
tugtugin
pot
.
pv
.
ipfv
~hear
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
music
‘Pedro hears the music.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
h<um>alo
ang
pulot
sa
gatas
<
av
>
pfv
.mix
subj
honey
dat
milk
‘The honey got accidentally mixed with the milk.’
Note: This is classified this as ACT_LOC because "sa" does not seem to alternate with "ng".
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
t<in>i~tign-an
ni
Pedro
ang
ulap
<
ipfv
>
ipfv
~look-
lv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
cloud
‘Pedro is looking at the clouds.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
h<in>ubad
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
damit
<
pv
>
pfv
.take_off
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
shirt
‘Pedro took off his shirt.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-pa~panaginip-an
ni
Pedro
si
Maria
pot
.
ipfv
-
ipfv
~dream-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro dreams about Maria.’
Note: The GEN encoding of Y is possible in the AV construction, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
s<um>ang-ayon
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
<
av
>
pfv
.agree
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro agreed with Miguel.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is not possible.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
<in>away
si
Pedro
ni
Maria
<
pv
>
pfv
.fight
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
gen
pn
‘Maria quarreled with Pedro.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LIN
X: ACT
Y: LIN
Locus: Y
nag-ka~ka-halaga
ng
piso
ito-ng
baso
av
-
com
~
ipfv
-cost
lin
peso
3.
sg
.
subj
-
lin
cup
‘This cup costs 1 peso.’
Note: The DAT encoding of the Y-argument is also possible.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
b<in>aril
ni
Pedro
ang
ibon
<
pv
>
pfv
.shoot
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
bird
‘Pedro shot the bird.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
nag-salin
si
Pedro
ng
asukal
sa
garapon
av
.
pfv
-pour
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
sugar
dat
container
‘Pedro poured the sugar in a container.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-wala
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
susi
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-lose
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
key
‘Pedro lost his keys.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
l<um>ubog
ang
troso
sa
tubig
<
av
>
ipfv
.sink
subj
log
dat
water
‘The log sank in the water.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is not possible.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
p<in>atay
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
pfv
.kill
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro killed Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
s<in>untok
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
pfv
.hit
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro hit Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
h<in>alik-an
ni
Pedro
si
Maria
pfv
.kiss-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro kissed Maria.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
naka-basa
si
Pedro
ng
isa-ng
nakakatuwa-ng
libro
pot
.
av
.
pfv
-read
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
one-
lin
interesting-
lin
book
‘Pedro read an interesting book.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
g<in>alaw
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
daliri
<
pv
>
pfv
.move
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
finger
‘Pedro moved his finger.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
<ni>re~respeto
ni
Pedro
si
Maria
<
pv
>
ipfv
~respect
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro respects Maria.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
nan-di~diri
si
Pedro
sa
maru~rumi-ng
hugasin
av
.
ipfv
-
ipfv
~get_disgusted
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
dirty.
pl
-
lin
dishes
‘Pedro is squeamish about dirty dishes.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promoted to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_CAUSE
X: SBJNV
Y: CAUSE
Locus: XY
kuntento
si
Pedro
dahil
sa
kaniya-ng
anak
content
pers
.
subj
pn
because.of
dat
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
son
‘Pedro is content with his son.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (adjective).
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
na-pa-ibig
si
Pedro
kay
Maria
av
.
pfv
-
caus
-fall_in_love
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro fell in love with Maria.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible with different NPs, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
nag-ti~tiwala
si
Pedro
kay
Maria
av
-
ipfv
~trust
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro trusts Maria.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is not possible.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
na-ki-ki~simpatya
si
Pedro
sa
kaniya-ng
nanay
av
-
soc
-
ipfv
~sympathize
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
mother
‘Pedro sympathises with his mother.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is not possible.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
na-i~inggit
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
av
.
ipfv
-
ipfv
~envy
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro envies Miguel.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promoted to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
na-ga~galit
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
av
.
ipfv
-
ipfv
~get_angry
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro is angry with Miguel.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promoted to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
na-gulat
si
Pedro
sa
regalo
sa
kaniya
av
.
pfv
-get_surprised
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
gift
dat
3.
sg
.
dat
‘Pedro was surprised at this gift.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promoted to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_LOC
X: SBJNV
Y: LOC
Locus: XY
mahilig
sa
tsaa
si
Pedro
like.
adj
dat
tea
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro loves tea.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (adjective).
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_LOC
X: SBJNV
Y: LOC
Locus: XY
mahilig
si
Pedro
sa
mainit
na
tsaa
like.
adj
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
hot
lin
tea
‘Pedro enjoys hot tea.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (adjective). The Y-argument can only be signalled by DAT.
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
gusto
ni
Pedro
ng
bago-ng
telepono
like
pers
.
gen
pn
gen
new-
lin
phone
‘Pedro wants a new mobile phone.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate. The GEN marker on the Y-argument signals indefiniteness (otherwise SUBJ is required). Co-exists with the construction in 129. The pattern is exceptional and cannot be fitted into the classification based on voice contrasts.
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_LOC
X: SBJNV
Y: LOC
Locus: XY
may
sama
ng
loob
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
exist
bad
gen
feelings
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro has a grudge against Miguel.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
na-galit
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
av
.
pfv
-get_angry
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro took offence at Miguel.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promoted to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
i<ni>nis
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
pfv
.upset
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro greatly upset Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
na-mangha
si
Pedro
sa
kaniya-ng
bayan
av
.
pfv
~get_amazed
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
town
‘Pedro marvelled at this town.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promoted to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
k<in>asu-suklam-an
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
ipfv
>
stem
-
ipfv
~despise-
cv
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro despises Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
s<um>ama
ang
loob
ni
Pedro
sa
kaniya-ng
anak
<
av
>
ipfv
.get_bad
subj
feelings
pers
.
gen
pn
dat
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
son
‘Pedro got upset with his son.’ (Lit. ‘Pedro’s feelings at his son got bad.’)
Note: Not included in the database because X is expressed as an NP-internal modifier.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
na-i~irita
si
Pedro
sa
kaniya-ng
anak
na
babae
av
.
ipfv
-
ipfv
~get_irritated
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
child
lin
female
‘Pedro is getting irritated with his daughter.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promoted to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_SBJNV
X: ACT
Y: SBJNV
Locus: Y
gusto
ni
Pedro
si
Maria
like
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro likes Maria.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate. The interpretation of X as ACT is partially arbitrary (it is based on the analogy with constructions with voice markers).
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
i-k<in>a-hi~hiya
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
tangkad
cv
-<
ipfv
>
stem
-
ipfv
~be_ashamed
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
height
‘Pedro is shy about his height.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promoted to subject in the causal voice construction.